Sidebar

07
Wed, Dec

Fifteen Strategies to Circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (FIFTH) - CNN iReports (article link)

Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

THE FIFTH STRATEGY

THE HOMELESSNESS WEAPON

Citizens are presented with the believe that they have rights and civil liberties, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but they are circumvented through the use of homelessness, the homelessness weapon.

The Police, Criminal Judicial System, and Mob are linked to eliminating a citizens means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations or during long delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to make a conviction or smear campaign easier, mobbing in modern society.


http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-733909
Ten Strategies to Circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

THE FIRST STRATEGY

MENTAL ILLNESS, DISCRIMINATION, ASSESSMENT ORDERS, THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL

The first strategy uses assessment orders before trial, disability and mental illness, and participating psychiatrists to circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The strategy is linked to smear campaigns and using assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility of committing a crime due to mental illness before trial when the accused has not committed a crime. It uses ignorance or the claim that being not guilty of committing a crime due to mental illness is the same as simply being not guilty. The accused does not go to trial or get a trial.

This strategy means that each year the Police can use false allegations, uttered threats for example, break down the accused's door and damage personal property, search his home without a warrant, seize computers without a warrant, and escape It all through an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness, circumventing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms regarding the need for search warrants, entering and searching a dwelling home, seizure of computers and private information, and the right to a fair trial.

Example 1

Assessment Orders Before Trial and "Unlawful"

A judge issues an order after a demand by the prosecutor for an assessment, an evaluation for non-criminal responsibility before trial without any supporting evidence, which is unlawful according to judge Pittfield R v. Muschke, assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility are supposed to be made at the end of trial, interferes with an accused's defense and is discrimination if they are not, Supreme Court of Canada R v. Swain, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, requiring Appeals that are expensive and linked to delays, while attempts are made to force or complete this assessment order before it is Appealed, which circumvents the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Example 2

Threat of Being Framed To Accept Assessment Order

Behavior and corruption are used to intimidate and threaten the accused towards accepting a plea of non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness before trial. "they are going to frame you" "the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility is to help you".

THE SECOND STRATEGY

THE SEIZURE OF COMPUTERS, PRIVATE INFORMATION

The second strategy involves the seizure of computers without a warrant, returning the seized computers, and claiming the accused cannot prove the Police have made copies and therefore cannot ask for a court order that any existing copies from the seizure be destroyed.

This strategy means that without the court order for any existing copies to be destroyed the Police may have copies of private information from the seizure of computers and may use it at a later time resulting in circumventing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Difference:

1. A Prosecutor mistaken or having been misinformed about the existence of copies to benefit in the proceedings at a later time means the accused has to sue him for damages, and he may not be liable or subject to a complaint with the chief Crown Prosecutor.

2. If a Judge issues an order for the destruction of any existing copies and it is later discovered the Police and Prosecutor have copies, searched them, and attempt to use them, these are illegal acts.

Example 3

"you cannot prove the police have copies"

After seizing computers without a warrant, keeping the computers for several weeks, the computers are returned. An Application for Destruction of any existing copies in any form be destroyed is rejected. The prosecutor argument "the accused cannot prove the police have copies and to his knowledge there are no copies".

THE THIRD STRATEGY

COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION, PRIVACY, SECURITY OF THE PERSON

Another strategy example to circumvent the Canadian Charter: False allegations along with insinuations that the accused is dangerous are used to obtain communications interception and surveillance.

Court delays, unlawful orders, prosecutors that do not want to drop the charges but do not want to ask for a trial either knowing the allegations are false, judges ordering trials that are not asked for by prosecutors or the accused are used to extend the period of time that the accused is under communications interception and surveillance.

Using false allegations, insinuations the accused is dangerous, and extending the court proceedings through delays and orders to obtain communications interception that circumvents the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Example 4

False Allegations, Communications Interception

After false allegations of uttering threats 264.1 (1)(a) to cause death or serious bodily harm, insinuations the accused is dangerous, communications interception can be requested under section 183, 184, of the criminal code.

Example 5

False Allegations, Communications Interception, Threats

The use of false allegations, uttering threats s. 264 (1)(a) for example, to obtain communication interception under section s. 183 for surveillance and internet usage to threaten or eliminate a person's welfare or disability income under false pretenses, the homelessness weapon, in attempts to escape false allegations similar to the assessment order before trial, while the accused attempts to defend themselves from these allegations.

THE FOURTH STRATEGY

INFORMATION/DENOUNCIATION

The fourth strategy and possibility is similar to the seizure of computers and claiming the accused cannot prove the Police have copies to ask that any existing copies be destroyed, and linked to it in smear campaigns and malicious prosecutions.

The Crown Prosecutor claims to his knowledge there are no copies followed later by the Police claim "we did have copies, the prosecutor said we had no copies, sue him if you want too".

The Information/Denounciation is the allegations that a Justice indicates without a signature, the Justice signature is a stamp on the front blue sheet of the Prosecutors file. So the prosecutor can actually give the accused a phony unsigned Information/Denounciation document with a limited allegation, and later another with a larger list of allegations can be used resulting in the same response from the Police "the prosecutor gave you that phony document, sue him if you want too".

THE FIFTH STRATEGY

THE HOMELESSNESS WEAPON

Citizens are presented with the believe that they have rights and civil liberties, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but they are circumvented through the use of homelessness, the homelessness weapon.

The Police, Criminal Judicial System, and Mob are linked to eliminating a citizens means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations or during long delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to make a conviction or smear campaign easier, mobbing.

THE SIXTH STRATEGY

JUDGE/ACCUSED ASKS FOR TRIAL

Following criminal allegations the Crown Prosecutor is supposed to ask for a trial, to prosecute, or drop the charges, not a Judge or the Accused.

There are reasons why in some cases the Crown Prosecutor would not want ask for a trial such as knowing the allegations are false or he does not have a strong case and would not want to be responsible for a trial or the expense linked to the failed prosecution.

Criminal allegations make a citizen vulnerable to organized crime and different patterns linked to the mob or mobbing, the accused eventually lose their means of subsistence, if they were not eliminated pre-criminal allegations, making prosecution easier and the possibility of being sued for malicious allegations or prosecutions unlikely so delays in asking for trial are in the favor of Crown Prosecutors, linked to the Accused being under pressure from the mob or workplace psychological harassment and wishing to go to trial to prove their innocence as soon as possible.

In the case where the Accused can withstand these pressures from the mob or organized crime and the Crown Prosecutor does not wish to ask for the trial, a Judge can be used to do it, to increase the delays and the links to them.

This strategy circumvents the Charter by removing the responsibility for prosecution, malicious prosecutions, from the Crown Prosecutors and placing the responsibility on the Accused, or a Judge.

Example 6

Some examples linked to pressure from the mob or organized crime during criminal allegations that have been reported:

a) workplace psychological harassment with different threats to the accused's means of subsistence.

b) the use of sound technology, the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound, used for criminal harassment and threat's in the accused's own home or for high levels of sleep deprivation, high levels of sleep deprivation before court appearances.

c) powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes in the accused's own home linked to deadly cancers such as leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, testicular cancer, and the increasing risk for these as the length in criminal proceedings increases.

Example 7

The use of sound technology, the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound, used for criminal harassment and threat's in the accused's own home or for high levels of sleep deprivation, high levels of sleep deprivation before court appearances. The criminal harassment, threats, and provocation are interpreted as being part of an investigation if the accused is also under communications interception or surveillance. The angry response to these threats and criminal harassment are interpreted as "the Police is listening, investigation".

THE SEVENTH STRATEGY

DISABILITY, INTERVENTION AND VULNERABILITY

This strategy is similar and linked to the first one that can consists of attempts to incarcerate citizens for psychological evaluation and during the long criminal proceedings, resulting in great legal representation costs, to bankrupt the accused, assessment orders that are unlawful without any supporting evidence for non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness before trial when released on conditions. The mobs use of powerful radar assaults that lead to increased expenses as victims of these try to avoid these assaults or purchase expensive shielding materials, metal or lead, threats of intervention linked to attempts to avoid these, running away, or shielding efforts, which lead to incarceration for evaluation, being incarcerated during the long criminal proceedings along with the high cost of legal representation, and the increased risk of being framed through participants, participating defense lawyers or psychiatrists, the claim that you are not guilty due to mental illness of having committed the crime, when the accused has not committed the crime but would sanction wrong doing such as false allegations and search/seizures without warrants, linked to the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial, which according to the Supreme Court of Canada is supposed to be made at the end of trial as to not interfere with the defense, and discrimination.

A disability is a vulnerability that can be exploited by the Police, Crown Prosecutors, mob, organized crime, criminal harassment participants and networks etc.

Example 8

a) Following a demand that the accused remain incarcerated for psychological evaluation that fails and a conditional release with a demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility that succeeds, the accused is assaulted by powerful radar leading to strange behavior, deteriorating personal hygiene as they try to avoid these and attempts to shield themselves from these through the use of dense materials, the police try to intervene, which leads to incarceration during the proceedings and the "unlawful" assessment order before trial.

b) Private Information, if the police are after private information and involved in wrong doing, the search and seizure of private computers without a warrant, incarceration for psychological evaluation and intervention leading to incarceration combined with the unlawful assessment order before trial leads to obtaining more private information, private medical information.

c) Time, Orders that are unlawful can be Appealed, Appeals increase legal costs, and even more expensive when incarcerated combined with another important factor, pressure to complete the unlawful assessment order or risk incarceration, non-criminal responsibility that sanctions the allegations, wrong doing, and to obtain the private medical information before it can be Appealed.

Example 9

Intervention and Vulnerability, during the release with an assessment order for non-criminally responsible the Police use the threat of intervention linked to the behavior, incarceration, high cost of legal representation, being vulnerable to participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists, being framed, and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility. Criminal harassment network participant use the threat of intervention linked to behavior, the protection measures from their powerful radar assaults, which are linked to deadly cancers, leukemia, lung cancer, etc.

Example 10

Disability, mental illness, is used as a justification to demand the accused remain incarcerated for evaluation, justification to demand surveillance etc.

The seventh strategy circumvents the Charter by exploiting a disability, a vulnerability, and discrimination.

THE EIGHTH STRATEGY

PARTICIPATING DEFENSE LAWYERS/PSYCHIATRISTS

Participating defense lawyers are used by the mob to help in the high cost of criminal proceedings and a successful conviction that is hard to Appeal given the "representation" by legal council, a defense lawyer. Any claim by the accused that this defense lawyer was used in a setup and participated in a smear campaign, framing the accused, results in a lawsuit against the accused and more expenses, another mob strategy.

Participating psychiatrists can help with assessment orders that are given before trial for non-criminal responsibility or in attempts to control the criminal proceedings through a participating defense lawyer.

Example 11

Following a demand by the Police that the accused remain incarcerated for an evaluation the participating defense lawyer tells the accused that he has no choice but to remain incarcerated where he would be vulnerable to participating defense lawyers, the high cost of legal council, and participating psychiatrists.

Example 12

In certain cases in the criminal code some demands can only be made by a defense lawyer but may be in the interest of the Police and Crown prosecutors. A participating defense lawyer can help in attempts to circumvent the criminal code restrictions.

Example 13

Participating psychiatrists are linked to private medical information that is given to the Crown prosecutor and Police, the possibility of fabricating psychological profiles to help the police and prosecutors in prosecutions, and assessments orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial that would sanction false allegations, incarceration, police wrong doing, search and seizures without warrants, and prevent lawsuits.

Smear campaigns often involve the use of the pedophilia weapon where the allegations immediately result in intense hatred and a label that sticks but can also involve other allegations such as "women hater".

Example 14

One strategy used by criminal harassment networks and participants is to use insinuation of pedophilia to put victims on the defensive and the threat of being labeled a pedophile to induce fear. One routine is to claim that they are going to "file up" a victim through a false "profile" and "psycho-analysis", the insinuations and discussions with a psychiatrist. For any victims of this type of criminal harassment strategy and threat, "going to fill you up, profile, psycho-analyzed", who wondered how this threat worked or how private medical information would be able to fall into the hands of prosecutors in the first place, the mechanism used, criminal allegations followed by a demand for assessment that transfers the private medical information to participating psychiatrists is the mechanism used in possible attempts to create false psychological profiles by criminal harassment participants, "profile" "going to fill you up" "psycho-analyzed" etc.

This strategy circumvents the Canadian Charter for a right to a Fair Trial, Security of the Person, Privacy, and Liberty.

THE NINTH STRATEGY

CRIMINAL HARASSMENT

Criminal harassment has been mentioned in other previous strategies, criminal harassment networks, the use of technology, the 2005 award winning sound technology that can be used for criminal harassment in a victims own home and high levels of sleep deprivation, powerful radar assaults in a victims own home linked to deadly forms of cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, while the accused is already overwhelmed financially by criminal allegations, insinuations that he is dangerous, and Police or Psychiatric intervention that would lead to incarceration during the criminal proceedings. Incarceration leading to other vulnerabilities, increased expense for legal council, and bad legal council or legal council that benefits in long criminal proceedings, participating psychiatrists, external members that the accused is now dependent on and vulnerable to to manage their affairs etc.

Here are some examples of criminal harassment directly linked to the criminal proceedings:

Example 15

Criminal allegations can result from victims of criminal harassment participants or networks using threats to induce fear, resulting in victims uttering threats in return, resulting in criminal allegations of uttering threats, and uttering threats can be used for communications interception and surveillance. The accused is criminally harassed in his own home through sound technology, the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound, and this criminal harassment, threats and provocation, the angry response to threats and provocation is interpreted as part of an investigation by the criminal harassment participants "the police are listening".

Example 16

The accused is highly sleep deprived before court appearances, at the court house criminal harassment participants attempt to induce as much stress and adrenaline as possible before the accused presents himself and his case before a court judge. Due to the high levels of stress and adrenaline the accused has more difficulty communicating and presenting his case.

The Criminal Harassment and these criminal harassment examples circumvent the Canadian Charter by interfering with a Fair Trial, the Security of the Person, and Liberty.

THE TENTH STRATEGY

CANCER

Similar to the way the mob and criminal harassment networks use workplace psychological harassment to eliminate a person's means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations, the mob and criminal harassment networks are now involved in attempts to destroy a person's health through high levels of sleep deprivation and criminal harassment pre-criminal allegations. During criminal allegations the accused is assaulted with powerful radar over long and delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to add more overwhelming expenses to the already overwhelming cost of legal council representation, to justify intervention and incarceration during the criminal proceedings, and to induce different types of cancers such as leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, and a favorite for men, prostate and testicular cancer.

Example 17

Criminal harassment participants use the 2005 award winning sound technology, HSS Hypersonic Sound, for criminal harassment and high levels of sleep deprivation combined with criminal harassment at local public places, see the routine example.

A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived through sound technology (HSS), criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor, and attempts at repetitive humiliation.

Example 18

This example involves a series of steps 1. powerful radar assaults begin 2. criminal allegations that trap the accused 3. insinuation that the accused is dangerous and needs to remain incarcerated 4. after release the behavior linked being assaulted by powerful radar is used to justify intervention in attempts to incarcerate the accused 5. if incarcerated the accused is vulnerable to participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists used by the mob 6. if the accused is not incarcerated the mob continues in it's attempts to induce high levels of damage and cancers 7. bitterness and anger at the police and mob 8. incarceration and cancer 9. death through cancer 10. hidden homicides through the medical system

A "cooking" process before incarceration, to make a person suffer through cancer, and to prevent release or exposure at a later time.

Example 19

Rage shootings, imagine this scenario, the mob begins assaulting a citizen with powerful radar, the police file criminal allegations that he uttered threats, that "he's dangerous", due to the powerful radar assaults and high levels of sleep deprivation his daily functions are interfered with and he loses his job, his means of subsistence, and after several months of high levels of sleep deprivation and repetitive powerful radar assaults he gets seriously sick .. rampages and rage shootings are interpreted as a "deranged person" without any more information to the public.

Section 12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

The powerful radar assaults attempt to circumvent the Canadian Charter through attempts to overwhelm the finances of an accused who has a right to legal council, which are already overwhelming costs linked to a Fair Trial. Incarceration through the use of organized crime, strategy, intervention, false pretenses, the right to Liberty. The right not to be subjected to any Cruel and Unusual Treatment or Punishment, cancer and hidden homicides through the medical system.

Example 20

Disability, here is a strategy example that involves other previously mentioned examples to attack welfare recipients with a disability and people with a disability income. The police file criminal allegations or fabricate criminal allegations, the accused is overwhelmed by the cost of legal representation and threatened by participating defense lawyers, a smear campaign, his attempts to defend himself are said to be "work", "you are working", a threat to their disability income, their means of subsistence, and linked to a pattern that involves the police and mob, attacking and eliminating the means of subsistence of citizens to make conviction easier and to prevent lawsuits or exposure, the homelessness weapon.

ABUSE OF PROCESS, STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Violations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in criminal allegations and court proceedings can be addressed in court before trial, which can result in a Stay of Proceedings.

THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadians from "oppressive laws", a stay of proceedings is given for violations, laws are modified or repealed, and attempts to circumvent the Charter are linked to oppression.

U.S. AMENDMENTS AND BILL OF RIGHTS

In the U.S. these strategies would be like the Police and Prosecutors trying to circumvent the U.S. Amendments and Bill of Rights. "They guarantee a number of personal freedoms, limit the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and reserve some powers to the states and the public."

Why Write These Strategies?

Why write these strategies or possibilities, so that measures can be taken to make sure that they can not be used.

Awareness and prevention, protecting our Rights and Freedom, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, similar to the U.S. Amendments and Bill of Rights.